Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3356 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Marstons, acting with a High Court writ, have amassed over £500 of additional costs on top of the bill for £1,300

(water I never used, faulty meter no doubt but I can't prove it).

 

I have simply been unable to pay - about 8 eviction attempts over the last few years from hideous rip off mortgage lenders

and since all my money went to clear those arrears, now an Attachment of Earnings for Council Tax as they want their money now.

 

I have absolutely nothing of any value and I have emailed Marstons to tell them that. No car, 14" TV that I bought secondhand for £25, no iphone, no sound system, no jewellery. Nothing.

 

They have been once (neighbour says a guy knocked on the door) and that cost me £295 more.

 

Should I just let them in to see that I have nothing?

Otherwise every time they come back it will presumably be another £300.

 

I am happy to pay a little, but simply cannot afford more.

 

AW refuse to take the debt back.

 

So they are giving money to Marstons which they could have had.

 

Makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to me. And as a woman alone the whole process is terrifying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think a stay of execution would be the best way.

 

 

Show to a court what you can afford to pay and let them set the amount.

 

Call national debtline and they will explain.

 

 

https://www.nationaldebtline.org/EW/factsheets/Pages/31%20EW%20High%20Court%20enforcement/Page-05.aspx

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

 

Are those charges for real??? £295 for knocking on the door and poking a piece of paper through?

 

 

Do you have any idea how many times they are allowed to do that?

 

 

How on earth is this allowed to go on in a civilised country???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stay of execution on N244 is a priority,

 

 

it needs to be taken in person to your local county court if they are a district registry to the High Court,

 

 

if not you will need to get it to the issuing Court.

 

 

Your grounds would be you cannot afford the debt or the associated fee's and you have made a further application for a variation in payment.

 

 

If you take the N244 in person you can explain the urgency,

 

 

it is often a case there is a 'spare' Judge who can address your application there and then,

 

 

failing that once the Court have stamped it you can ask for a copy and send it to Marstons,

they should then retire from further enforcement until the order is decided.

 

With your N245 you will need to complete a common financial statement to back up your proposal to pay what is affordable to you..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if it is allowed.

 

 

AW are horrible people so I don't suppose it would bother them.

 

 

So is the outcome of this that Marstons can charge me about £500 a visit for as long as they like?

 

 

I can remember a thread on here where someone said they lost their house because of Anglian Water. I can begin to see why!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If 295 was charged on the first visit, then £594 will be charged on the second. Third visit fee is £490+vat + 7.5% of the debt.

 

Out of interest, isn't this a consumer debt? Consumer debts chased by high court? Allowed?

 

Where did you pluck those figures from?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here as well:

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/1/schedule/made?view=plain

 

 

PS: It needs to also be stressed that if a payment proposal is outlined to the HCEO on receipt of the Notice of Enforcement then the enforcement company may only accept the proposal on condition that a visit is made the the debtors property on behalf of the creditor to get a Controlled Goods Agreement signed. This provision does confuse people but unless full payment is made then the HCEO is under a duty to the creditor to 'secure goods'.

 

The visit will incur a fee of £190. For the avoidance of doubt...any person wanting to repay a judgment that has been transferred to the High Court for enforcement by monthly payment will always incur the First Stage Enforcement fee of £190.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are relying on CAB? I thought you were a bailiff?

 

Anyway, without VAT, £1300 debt;

 

1st visit = £190 + 7.5% of £300 (£22.50), total £212.50

2nd visit = £495, nothing more can be added

Removal/sale stage = £525 + £22.50, total £547.50

 

Not sure where your figures come into it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are relying on CAB? I thought you were a bailiff?

 

 

 

Anyway, without VAT, £1300 debt;

 

 

 

1st visit = £190 + 7.5% of £300 (£22.50), total £212.50

 

2nd visit = £495, nothing more can be added

 

Removal/sale stage = £525 + £22.50, total £547.50

 

 

 

Not sure where your figures come into it.

 

Sigh

 

+Vat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway, the creditor is technically the one liable for any VAT, as the bailiff is providing a service for them, not the debtor. The creditor is free to reclaim the VAT.

 

So the next time I buy a Mars Bar I must remember to tell the shopkeeper I am entitled to 20% discount as I won't pay for him to provide me with his services...... really?? .......'come fly with me' is playing on the radio in the background

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be pedantic but if the bailiff comes back and charges me another £300 for the privilege and I let him in to see there is absolutely nothing of any value, is that the end of it from his perspective? On the basis that he cannot take what I haven't got?

 

 

What happens to the unbelievably huge sum I then owe the bailiffs, as presumably they would send the debt back to Anglian Water?

 

 

Oh and would the fact I had let him in once mean that for the remainder of his or my life, whichever is the longer, he has the right to enter my house whenever he feels like it???

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the baillif sends the debt back to the Creditor as "uncollectable"

and no goods of value that can be seized to satisfy the debt

then all fees charged will be removed.

 

 

However that does not stop the Creditor engaging another HCEO and the whole process starts again

or they may take other forms of enforcement such as making you appear in Court to explain why you have not paid,

a Charging Order on your home

- if you own it

- plus any other action that is available to them.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone. I have offered AW a charge on my home but they don't want it because they say they need to go through other procedures first.

 

 

I have told them I have nothing for the bailiff to take. Although I have a reasonable house that is all I have and the bailiff, if he takes notes, will have seen that it is in desperate need of repair as I have not had the money available for its upkeep.

 

 

I intend to sell it within the next few years and hoped AW would be prepared to wait, albeit adding interest.

 

 

But they have their procedures and want to do this first. Seems daft but I suppose they will not take my word for the fact I have nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have nothing to take, then i would not worry as what you dont have, the EA cant take.

As long as you dont have a car outside and dont let them in,

eventually they will return it to the client. usually after 2 or 3 visits if it can be seen you have nothing.

 

I would try sending the water comapny proof of being a single parent, single carer, unemployed etc etc

(im not saying you are any of the above) in the hopes they bring it back in house either for a charge if you have equity or for a small repayment schedule.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...